No composer wants to sound predictable. But unless you learn to combine predictability with nonconformity, you’ll have trouble writing vibrant, original melodies.
WHAT DO MUSICIANS MEAN BY “PREDICTABLE?”
Musicians use the word predictable is a catchall term for music that sounds cliche – overused, uninspired, or derivative. One of the main purposes of this blog is to show you why it’s a mistake to use the words predictable and cliché as synonyms. But for now, let’s go with it because this misnomer will help me make my case.
The website “Consequence Of Sound.net” asked some music reviewers to name the music clichés they found most annoying. Here are a few choice responses:
- exit fake-outs at the end of a concert
- dubstep remixes
- late-song key change
- rap interludes in pop and R&B songs
And a similar poll was posted on the music theory subreddit. As one might expect, these responses have more to do with the materials of music than its performance.
- the “Axis of Awesome” progression (I-V-vi-IV)
- 4 on the floor
- descending chromatic bassline
- wanting to be famous
- the major scale
- 4/4 time
Really? Do you expect anyone to believe that getting rid of the major scale and 4/4 time will open the way to more original-sounding music? C’mon Redditors!
As ridiculous this sounds, it turns out to be historically accurate. For much of the 20th century, composers made it their objective to strip music of regular meters and keys. (I know because I participated.) Although there are many profound, inventive works from this era, 98% of the music left 99% of audiences 100% in the dark. Here’s an example you’ve no doubt encountered if you’ve gone to music school.“Structures I,” for two pianos, by Pierre Boulez (1951)
If you had trouble making sense of “Structures I,” it’s not due to any deficiency on your part. Boulez established strict mathematical formulas for every note, duration, dynamic, and register in this piece. Mathematical formulas, not musical formulas. Why?
Because “Structures I” was composed shortly after World War II. The consensus at the time was that the Romantic spirit – once celebrated as the untamed and untapped inner potential that could bring humankind to its unending greatness – was also what made us capable of the atrocities committed against fellow human beings. Whilst the early part of the 20th century charted a modernist course for keeping music “new,” after WWII, the pace kicked into high gear. Artists like Boulez took great pains to remove all traces of personal choice and human artifacts from their music.
The fear that humanity could not be trusted lasted for nearly half a century among intellectuals and those who practiced “high art.” Meanwhile, popular music—and here, I mean music that drew from African roots—began to burgeon and yield fruit at an accelerating rate.
THE INNATELY HUMAN NATURE OF MUSICAL MATERIAL
Here’s what I meant when I said that music has “human artifacts.” The essential elements of music – rhythm, melody, and harmony – resonate with audiences because they “embody” our most basic impulses. Take rhythm. Human beings walk, chew, shovel snow, and copulate in rhythm. Or melody. Our speaking voices rely upon pitch, stress, phrasing, and tempo to clarify and amplify the meaning of our words. Harmonies can not only capture moods, but they can also express our fears and desires. For example, some chords have a gravitational attraction toward other chords – a “tension” that cries for resolution – in parallel with so many situations we face.
For as long as anyone can remember, human beings have made music to record and express their experiences and feelings. But music delves deeper than this. Every human culture has found ways to shape the essential elements of music to capture their notions of ideal love, beauty, purpose, and more. And although every style has its unique hallmarks, they all use the same overall process to turn sounds into expression. Establish patterns, then break them in intriguing ways.
YES, “PREDICTABLE” CAN MEAN “OVERUSED” (cliché), BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, IT’S A PSYCHOLOGICAL PHENOMENON.
Human beings are pattern-recognizing creatures who LOVE to be surprised. As soon as our brains recognize a pattern (and this happens in nanoseconds), they begin comparing what they presently hear with what they’ve heard in other songs. They also make predictions based on the behavior of the song currently playing. Any deviations get appraised immediately. “Why this change?” “Why here?” “What might it mean?” “Would another change be more interesting?”
Keep in mind that everything I’ve just described happens subconsciously, unless we think about it directly, which we’ll do starting now.
Below, I’ve “de-composed” a popular song from the 1930’s. To de-compose a melody, we walk back anything that seems unusual (unpredictable) to its most predictable version. It’s a great way to see what the composer did to achieve the effects that give the melody its spark of life.
In this melody, the words “smile with my” fit just fine over the same notes used for “valentine” during the first two iterations. But they have none of the expressive power of the unexpected Bb!“My Funny Valentine,” by Rogers and Hart (sung by Frank Sinatra)
Now imagine that YOU are the funny valentine. Which version would bowl you over? No contest, right? Please recognize that the high Bb would have none of its expressive power unless we expected something more typical. No predictable, no surprise. And this is why you need to use predictability in your melodies.
LEARN SOME MELODIC SCHEMAS.
Think of a schema as a reusable plan or template. A schema carries with it some underlying strategy for how and why things work together as they do. Now there are a handful of basic schemas for melody, plus dozens of variations thereof. And a good composer can riff off of existing schemas to engineer the perfect plot twist for any occasion.
“My Funny Valentine” uses one of these common schemas. Its basic plan goes as follows.
 State a melodic idea.
 Restate that melodic idea, typically over different harmony. (This may require adjusting the melody to fit.) The new harmony casts the original idea in a new light.
 Begin a third restatement, don’t continue the melody as before. Instead, do something unexpected – something expressive!
Once you know this schema, you’ll begin to notice it everywhere. Even in tunes you’ve heard thousands of times!“Happy Birthday,” by Patty Hill
So schemas offer one way to use predictability to create expectation in a melody. Think of a schema as predictability on a macro level. Now I’d like to show you how to engage micro-level predictability in any melody you write.
THE “GEOMETRY” OF MELODIC FIGURES
What could be more predictable than geometry?
In geometry class, we learned that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. The same holds true for melodic figures. Say we have two melody notes, each on a strong beat. Because they both fall on strong beats, it makes to think of the first note as a starting point and the second note as a goal. The most direct way to get from the first goal note to the next is to move by step in the same direction. That’s what option A does in the example below.“6 different ways to get from D to G,”
But options B-F take less direct routes from D to G. Each route creates a unique profile when we look at the notation. The important thing, however, is not how they look, but HOW THEY FEEL WHEN SUNG OR PLAYED.
- Option A looks, sounds, and feels the most direct, natural, and predictable.
- Options B and C take a roundabout route to the destination, and glide into it smoothly.
- Options D and E lead upward, as if intending to land on some note in that register, but then each suddenly plunges downward. This sort of indirect approach gives the final note (G) an accent.
- As for option F, how would you describe it? Complicated? Zig-zaggy? Playful? Drunk?
In my research of melodic “routes” and their effects, I’ve found 24 commonly-used figures, shown on the chart below. Turns out that 1/3 of the figures have no particular inclination for where they “go” – that is, what the next note will be. I’ve fogged out such figures on the chart below. Each of the remaining figures have a “most-expected destination.”
the 24 common melodic figures
To show you what I mean by the “most-expected destinations” here are a handful of the “predictable figures” from the chart above. The audio file plays the predictable version first, followed by the version below it (“some other outcome”).“some predictable figures compared with another possible outcome,”
Generally speaking, the most predictable destination for any figure sounds “natural,” “easy-going,” or “logical.” Whe a composer wants to create some other effect, he’ll “interrupt” or “alter” the destination note.
Now, it’s one thing to compare versions of a figure in an abstract graphic and sound file. The true test comes when we see how real musicians use predictability and disruption to make an actual song say what they want it to say. So let’s do that.
PREDICTABILITY AND EXPRESSION IN A FAMOUS BEACH BOY’S SONG
The Beach Boy’s hit song, “Wouldn’t It Be Nice” uses two of the figures illustrated in the previous example. Here is the marked-up score. Listen a few times and see what sense you might make of my annotations before reading my comments.“Wouldn’t It Be Nice,” by The Beach Boys
Not many songs begin with their hook. This one does. It makes perfect sense for the song’s message. Try something. Sing the words “wouldn’t it be nice,” returning to the first note on “nice” as I’ve notated in the graphic. This predictable version kills off all dreaminess, along with every ounce of zest for life!
Next, check out the setup for the money note – that high G on “stay.” The main body of this idea is the Run that I’ve highlighted. Breaking the natural tendency of the Run (which we heard in the previous example) would be surprising enough on its own. But Wilson makes it even more surprising by letting us hear the Run continue predictably to the D the first time through (a few bars earlier on the lyric “that”). Again, I urge you to test this for yourself. Try singing this pair of phrases the same way both times. The first time, let both Runs lead to D. The second time, let both Runs leap to the high G. I think you’ll agree that we have a prime example of the title of this blog. Wilson uses predictable to make this melody more surprising. (And delightful, and expressive, and memorable, and …)
Points for review
- Don’t fear predictable patterns. Use them to set up expectations. Then break those expectations in expressive ways.
- Schemas not only offer blueprints for sketching melodies, but they are also potent devices for creating expectations. Listeners anticipate certain outcomes based on prior experience. Schemas produce macro-level predictability.
- Most of the 24 common melodic figures have a most-predictable outcome—a way of moving to the next figure that feels smoother than all other options. Predictable figures produce micro-level predictability.
- Once you know exactly what makes music predictable, you can learn a lot from studying your favorite composers’ melodies. You’ll begin to understand how they achieved a particular effect and why. By listening and thinking in this way over time, you will strengthen and develop your musical intuitions.